WebGray v Thames Trains [2009] - Background. Facts: C suffers PTSD as a result of D's negligence. C kills a pedestrian while suffering with PTSD. C seeks compensation for loss of earnings and general harm resulting from manslaughter conviction WebGray v Thames Trains [2009] Criminal act committed by C may break chain of causation. The egg-shell skull rule. D must take V as they find them: If V suffers unforeseeable type of harm due to some existing weakness D must still compensate for full loss. Smith v Leech Brain [1962] Smith v Leech Brain. C had pre-existing ‘pre-cancerous’ skin ...
Traylor & Anor v Kent and Medway NHS Social Care ... - Outer …
WebApr 7, 2024 · T admitted that G’s injuries were caused by their negligence and that in principle they were liable for G’s loss of earnings up to the date of the manslaughter. However, they denied liability in... WebStudy with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital [1969], Nyang v G4S Care & Justice Services Ltd and others [2013], If probability is over 50% that C's harm would not have occurred but for D's conduct. ... [Factual causation]P drank tea laced with arsenic. D never diagnosed this and sent ... limak thermal boutique hotel
Factual causation Flashcards Quizlet
WebNov 1, 2009 · Gray v Thames Trains: Another Causation Dilemma November 2009 Psychiatry Psychology and Law 16 (3):333-339 Authors: Joel Townsend Abstract In the recent case of Gray v Thames... WebView Topic 6 Negligence - Causation - Remoteness(1).pdf from LAWS LAWS6023 at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Principles of Tort LAWS ... [1988] Fam 22 Gray v Thames Trains [2009] UKHL 33. Principles of Tort - Negligence - Causation (Remoteness) 2014 Causation Test for … WebFeb 10, 2024 · The Judge relied upon the statement of principle in the well-known authority of Gray v Thames Trains Ltd [2009] UKHL 33, in which Lord Hoffman held that “in general a defendant will not be liable for damage of which the immediate cause was the deliberate act of the claimant or a third party, that principle does not ordinarily apply when the ... limaland motor park